The AI Industry's Bid to Buy the 2026 Elections

OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta are funneling tens of millions through a web of PACs and dark money groups to back candidates across multiple states. Here's where every publicly disclosed dollar is going.

Data through Mar 6, 2026 · FEC, TEC & IL SBE filings · Updated daily
$15.9M
Total independent expenditures tracked
27
Candidates targeted across 5 states
$30M+
Dark money from undisclosed donors
$2.1M
Most spent to target a single candidate*
$9.0M
$4.9M
$2.1M
$9.0M supporting Republicans
$4.9M supporting Democrats
$2.1M opposing Democrats
$11.3M
$1.6M
$3.0M
$11.3M Leading the Future (OpenAI/a16z/Palantir/Perplexity)
$1.6M Meta
$3.0M Public First / Anthropic (pro-safety)
01 Where the money lands
Hover or click a state or candidate to trace the money
Supporting Republicans
Supporting Democrats
Opposing Democrats
State
Spent
Races
* The $5M in spending on the Florida governor's race (Donalds) is based on NBC News reporting and is not yet confirmed via filed disclosures. It is excluded from the "most spent" figure above.
02 Follow the money
FEC filings Statements & media Relationship Support Oppose
Pro-AI / Big Tech
Leading the Future Network
The largest network — anchored by $25M from OpenAI president Greg Brockman, $25M from Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz of a16z, with additional backing from Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale and Perplexity AI. Splits into Think Big (opposing/supporting Democrats) and American Mission (supporting Republicans), plus the dark-money arm Build American AI.
$11.3M in expenditures
Meta
Meta's spending spans Forge the Future (Texas state races), Making Our Tomorrow (Illinois), plus two dormant committees — American Tech Excellence ($45M) and META California ($20M).
$1.6M in expenditures
Pro-safety
Public First / Anthropic Network
Anthropic's $20M flows through Public First Action, a 501(c)(4) that also received $30M from undisclosed sources. The Super PAC arm funds Jobs & Democracy (Democrats) and Defending Our Values (Republicans).
$3.0M in expenditures
03 Recent filings
Mar 6
Public First files $1M opposing Jackson Jr. (IL-02), who is supported by Leading the Future
Mar 5
Making Our Tomorrow adds $66K across 4 Illinois races
Mar 5
American Mission: Gober (TX-10) support hits $991K
Mar 5
J&D PAC: Bores (NY-12) support hits $484K
Feb 25
J&D PAC files $150K supporting Allred (TX-33)
Feb 23
Meta gives $1.37M to Forge the Future Project (Texas)
Feb 15
Defending Our Values files $251K TV buy supporting Ricketts (NE-Sen)
04 Spending over time
Leading the Future Meta Public First / Anthropic
How AI political spending works

What are independent expenditures?

Independent expenditures are political spending made to support or oppose a candidate without coordinating with the campaign. These groups spend money on ads, mailers, and other efforts — and under current law, there's no limit on the amounts.

Super PAC vs. 501(c)(4)

A Super PAC can raise and spend unlimited money but must disclose donors. A 501(c)(4) "social welfare" nonprofit can also spend on elections but is not required to disclose funders. Several networks here use both: disclosed money flows into a Super PAC, while a 501(c)(4) acts as a pass-through, hiding the identity of some funders.

What is "dark money"?

Dark money refers to political spending where the original funding source is hidden, typically through 501(c)(4) nonprofits. The clearest examples here are Public First ($30M from undisclosed sources) and Build American AI (entirely hidden donors).

What we can't see

This tracker is built from public filings with the FEC, the Texas Ethics Commission, and the Illinois State Board of Elections. 501(c)(4) spending may not appear for months, some state expenditures are reported only in bulk filings, and informal coordination only surfaces through investigative journalism. What appears here is a floor, not a ceiling.

Click anywhere to dismiss highlight